Camera Sensors
Reproduction
resolutions
There are some points to
bear in mind with sensors when considering resolution and
reproduction sizes. Pixel size and sensor counts are not linked,
except where the sensor size remains constant. It is possible to
have a large pixel size and a high pixel count as demonstrated by
Canon's 5D and Nikon's D3. Equally it is possible to have large pixel
size and a low pixel count as per Sigma's SD14, or a high pixel count and a small pixel
size as with many digicams and high count DSLR's.
Pixel
size does not affect resolution which remains constant for the
sensor count. A 6mp sensor say, produces the same
resolution irrespective of the size of the sensor, whether it is a
small digicam type, or a larger DSLR one. But the size of
the sensor, and thus the size of the pixels, will determine the
quality of that resolution in respect of how visible it will be in
an image, how clearly and cleanly it will be reproduced.
Increases in sensor
counts do not always bring the increase in resolution that might be
expected. This is because the sensor count is not concerned with
linear measurement but rather area coverage. To double a sensors resolution you must
quadruple the pixel count. A 6mp sensor does not produce double the
resolution of a 3mp one. A 12mp sensor is required to do that.
Files sizes also quadruple as a result, meaning much longer
processing times.
To illustrate the
differences in resolution that sensor counts give we have produced
the following table. Although when this table was last revised in
2008 minimum sensor counts had increased quite considerably, with
5-6mp for digicams and 10mp for DSLR's, we
have included lower counts from 3mp up for some comparison and
perspective.
Sensor Resolution
Table
|
Sensor
|
Ratio
|
Resolution
|
File
Size
|
Printed
Sizes
|
|
size
|
format
|
height
x width
|
Mb's
|
6"x
4"
|
7"x
5"
|
8"x
6"
|
10"x
8"
|
A4
|
A3 |
| 24.8mp |
3x3 |
6104
x 4064 |
74.4mb |
1032ppi |
842ppi |
720ppi |
559ppi |
507ppi |
358ppi |
| 21.1mp |
3x2 |
5616
x 3744 |
63.3mb |
936ppi |
775ppi |
663ppi |
514ppi |
466ppi |
333ppi |
|
16.7mp
|
3x2
|
4992
x 3328
|
50.1mb
|
832ppi
|
689ppi
|
589ppi
|
457ppi
|
414ppi
|
303ppi |
|
14mp
|
3x2
|
4560
x 3024
|
42mb
|
760ppi
|
627ppi
|
512ppi
|
417ppi
|
377ppi
|
270ppi |
| 12mp |
3x2 |
4288
x 2848 |
36mb |
712ppi |
590ppi |
505ppi |
392ppi |
355ppi |
255ppi |
|
10mp
|
3x2
|
3872
x 2592
|
30mb
|
646ppi
|
535ppi
|
458ppi
|
355ppi
|
322ppi
|
230ppi |
|
8mp
|
4x3
|
3264
x 2448
|
24mb
|
578ppi
|
477ppi
|
408ppi
|
316ppi
|
287ppi
|
211ppi |
|
6mp
|
3x2
|
3008
x 2008
|
18mb
|
501ppi
|
415ppi
|
355ppi
|
275ppi
|
249ppi
|
179ppi |
|
5mp
|
4x3
|
2560
x 1920
|
15mb
|
453ppi
|
374ppi
|
320ppi
|
248ppi
|
225ppi
|
161ppi |
|
4mp
|
4x3
|
2240
x 1680
|
12mb
|
396ppi
|
328ppi
|
280ppi
|
217ppi
|
197ppi
|
141ppi |
|
3mp
|
4x3
|
2048
x 1536
|
9mb
|
362ppi
|
299ppi
|
256ppi
|
198ppi
|
180ppi
|
129ppi |
It is generally accepted
that 300 dpi/ppi is the basic requirement for a good print. But this
is really the resolution needed to print an image in a magazine, and
is why there is a continued call for ever higher pixel counts. 10mp
or greater is needed to satisfy this demand. A 10mp resolution file
is suitable for whole page (A4) reproduction, if the image quality
is good enough. For a magazine double page (A3) spread then around
twice this is needed, which is why high sensor count full frame
DSLR's like Canon's 1Ds series 16.7mp & 21mp DSLR's, and Sony's
forthcoming 24.8mp model are being produced. And why the expensive
medium format digital cameras and camera backs are also being
produced and developed that have sensor counts up to 39mp. These are
for large high quality reproduction images of the kind found in
large format books and magazines. Or hung on walls.
Using an inkjet printer, good quality can be obtained with a lower
figure, and anywhere between 150-200dpi has been proved to be more
than acceptable. Which means that these high sensor count
digital cameras aren't really needed by or aimed at the ordinary
camera user, be they enthusiastic amateur or semi-pro.
All of this is
relative to the printer that is used and the size an image is to be
reproduced at. If all you want is to print out your images at say
6"x4", then a 3mp camera is quite sufficient, and a 6mp or
larger sensor will not give a substantially better print at this size. If however
you want to make an A4 size print, then the 6mp image will look better than the 3mp. Again, if you use an ordinary inkjet printer
then the difference will not be as great as it will be if you use a
dedicated Photo inkjet printer.
As you can see from
looking at the chart it is now widely
accepted that for all general purposes a 6mp camera will be a good
all rounder, since its images can be printed at full A4 and look
quite alright. So in many cases a camera with a large
resolution sensor may cost more in terms of image storage space
needed and yet not produce images that are significantly more useful
to the 'average user'.
However if you are
intending to publish your images in a magazine that is printed using
conventional printing methods, known as 4 colour printing, then you
do need as high a pixel count as possible. This is because of the
different way an image is printed, requiring far higher resolution
to produce acceptable final image quality. 300dpi is the standard
resolution required, and sets the maximum size an image can be
reproduced at.
Please visit Printing Photos
for more information.
Another point to bear in
mind when considering sensor's is that as pixel counts increase, so
do image file sizes, so you need larger memory cards, and more
storage space and a much more powerful computer to process the
images at a reasonable speed.
Here is an illustration
showing 6mp and 10mp counts placed on a 12mp count in relation to each
other. The relationship remains constant,
as a ratio, whatever printed/displayed resolution is used. The
difference between the resolution of a 6mp and 12mp sensor whilst
significant is nevertheless perhaps not as big as you might expect.
You only have to crop the 12mp image a bit to end up with the equivalent
of a 6mp capture. And the difference between 10mp and 12mp is
frankly not worth worrying about, it's minor in resolution
difference terms, about 10%, as the previous table shows.
Printing
Comparisons
To illustrate all of
this here are some shots taken with three Digital Cameras. Two
digicams of 1mp and 3mp resolution, and a D-SLR with 6mp resolution.
All the shots were taken using as far as is possible comparable
focal lengths. A crop was then taken from a small portion of each
one and resized to the same size to illustrate the difference in
quality and detail that exists between them. On the lower left is
the 3mp shot of the image used showing the area cropped. On the
lower right is a composite which shows the size ratio each will be
at the same resolution.
1mp, 3mp, and 6mp
image comparison