Most
image editors have a levels tool. It's probably one of the quickest,
easiest and simplest tools to use to make general image corrections.
It combines a Histogram view with adjusters that allow the image
parameters to be altered. Here is the Photoshop version.
At
the very top is a drop down box that allows the user to choose which
colour channel to alter. The default is RGB which is all three, Red,
Green and Blue. When this is used the relationship between the
colour channels remains fixed, they are linked and stay in step with each other.
But if you wish you can choose to alter them individually, by
picking them from the drop down menu. When this is done then the
image colours change as it is the amount each colour channel
produces which determines the overall colours that the tonal values
in the image have.
Below
this are the input level boxes that indicate where their respective
sliders have been set. These are called the input levels because the
sliders concerned control how much of the image's tonal information is
used as input.
Three triangular sliders
are provided with which to make these alterations. The dark slider at the
left controls the limit of blackness, whilst the slider at the right
the limit of whiteness. In 8bit images where the number of tonal
values that can be described is 256 - 2^8 - the black point
has a value of 0 and the white point a value of 255. Moving
these sliders controls where the image dynamic range input stops, in
other words how much highlight and shadow detail in the image is
used.
The
middle slider controls the brightness of the image, the luminosity,
and this value is on a scale that uses 1 as the mid point and rises
when moved to the left, and falls to the right. The value of 9.99 is
the maximum and 0.10 the minimum.
Moving this lightens or darkens the image without
altering the overall levels. As
a general rule movement of the sliders is not that great as just a
small one can often result in a big change.
At
the bottom is another set of boxes and sliders. These control the
output. How much of the image information gathered is used. There
are just two sliders here. Which respectively control the limit of
black and white tonal output. Altering these changes the overall
tonal range produced, the limit of blackness and whiteness.
There
are also some dialog boxes down the side along with some tonal
pickers. The dialog boxes are really self explanatory, the 'auto'
box invokes the auto levels procedure. This works okay with some
images under certain conditions, but is a bit like giving control to
someone else. The result is often not what you want. The tonal
pickers can be used to automatically set either the mid-grey, black
or white point limits. Again the results can often be not what you
want.
For
this particular exercise we will stick with using the levels
manually, in RGB channel mode, and with maximum output levels. This
is how the levels dialog usually pops up when invoked - Ctrl+ L is
the keyboard shortcut in Photoshop.
Making
Image alterations
If it is the case
that histograms may look totally different but the image can be
quite correct, see Histograms , what is the point and usefulness of a histogram?
Well, that very much depends on your experience and abilities, but
basically it's main use is indicating where changes can be made when
it is already clear that an image is wrong. Either where highlights
have burnt out, shadow detail has been lost, or it's just under or
over exposed.
To be perfectly honest,
any experienced photographer will already know when an image or
scene is wrong or is going to be difficult to shoot correctly, and
will know what to do, or what options they have. Quite often it's a
case of having to make a choice when it's not possible to cover and
expose every tone in an image correctly, by for example spot
metering on a light coloured flower to expose and preserve the
detail in it, and allow it's darker surroundings to under-expose.
This is often the case
with scene's where some sunlight is present, or there is strong
directional lighting of some kind involved. One of the problems with
digital camera sensors at present is that they don't have as wide a
dynamic range as film, and more importantly electronic sensors
respond differently to that of film, so there are greater problems in high
contrast situations, where either highlights burn out, or shadow
detail blocks in. In these cases, as we are dealing with files that
are positive images, rather than negative, it's always preferable to
underexpose to preserve highlights, as generally shadow detail can
be 'pulled out' later in a photo editing application, yet burnt out or 'blown'
highlights cannot be restored.
Here is a shot of a
snowdrop. It was taken in program mode using multi-zone metering.
The background has been correctly exposed but the petals of the
snowdrop are over-exposed and the detail has been lost. The
highlights are 'blown' as you can see in the close up crop. This is
because the metering 'averages' the scene, and the flower petals
take up a relatively small proportion of the whole image. If the
image shot had been as the crop on the right, then in all
probability the exposure would have altered and not been as great,
and less detail lost.
Here is the histogram
for the image. If you look closely at the left side you can see that
all the dark tones have been captured as they finish before the edge is reached.
Making
Exposure Choices
So a choice has to be
made. Which is more important, the flower petals or the background?
If the answer is the flower, what is the answer to the problem?
Experience tells us, and is backed up by the histogram, that less
exposure is needed. There are several ways
of achieving this, depending on what options the camera you are
using has. Exposure compensation is one way. Most cameras have this
ability. Reducing the exposure in 0.5 or 1.0 steps until the correct
exposure is found is not difficult with a digital camera, and costs
nothing except your time and effort. A better and quicker
way, is to change the metering so the flower is the main focus.
Depending on how much of the image is occupied by the flower, using
either centre-weighted or spot-metering should give a better
exposure.
Because the flower was
small the next shot used spot metering, the reading being taken off
the petals.
Here's the histogram for
the image. As you can see by looking at the image and the histogram,
all the light tones have been captured and preserved, but the result
is that the dark tones have now been squashed and detail in the
shadows lost. The histogram also indicates that as the light tones
finished well before the edge, the exposure could have been longer
and therefore made the general scene and the background lighter.
However, this can be
corrected in Photoshop or any similar image editing application using the 'levels' command as we will now
show.
Making Alterations in
Photoshop Levels.
To start with we moved
the white slider left from 255 until it reached where the light
tones started at 206. This increased contrast to the limit that
could be used before highlights became affected, i.e. blown. Then we
moved the mid-tone point to 1.58 which lightened the overall image
background to a point we felt happy with.
Here is the result. If
you compare it with the overexposed shot you will see that the
background exposure is roughly the same, but the flower petals are
no longer blown and detail is present.
And here's the histogram
that results.
The tonal range has been
adjusted so it runs from 0-255. There are no blown highlights and no
dark areas blocked in.
Taking
the Correct Exposure
Now here is a correctly
exposed shot of the snowdrop. This was taken using centre-weighted
metering and in this instance has produced the best image of the
three metering patterns tried.
And here is it's
histogram. You will see that it is virtually identical to the
corrected shot's histogram.
Altering
Output levels
When
it is not possible to take alternative exposures, or you find out
later after taking a shot that highlight detail has burnt out or a
portion of sky is glary there is another alteration using levels
that can be made. Whilst it doesn't recover lost detail it can help
in some cases to reduce the impact over-bright and glary tones can
have on an image. And this is by making changes to the image output
levels, the limit of blackness, or more usually the limit of
whiteness. Careful use is needed
not to over-do the effect obtained because image contrast is reduced
as a consequence. But it is a useful alternative option when other
alterations don't have quite the required effect.
Here
are three more shots of the snowdrop. At the top left is the
original over-exposed image, at the right the correctly exposed one.
And below these is the over-exposed shot changed by reducing the
image whiteness output limit.
and
here is the levels histogram dialog showing where the output was set
at to obtain this result.
The
tonal range has been reduced so it's limited to 0-220. The contrast
has reduced as a result, more subdued or 'flat' looking, less
richness between the tones, but still preferable to the original
blown highlights version.
Being able to correct or
'save' shots that are not right is one of the benefits of digital
imaging, although getting the shot correctly exposed in the first
place is the best option if it's possible. If not then using a
histogram in conjunction with the image, as in levels, to understand what's
wrong and where to alter it to put
things right, is of great benefit.